


My day really started on Sunday night, as I finished my final preparations
for Monday's demo. (I must admit that while I was excited to "teach"
again, I was not thrilled to be prepping for a lesson during the summer.) The
demo seemed to go well; everyone participated and laughed - always a good sign!
But the most significant conversation/reflection started on Skype after my
demo. Lacy was struggling to put her question into words. She was worried about
restricting purpose and audience to a simple statement; she wanted to challenge
S.O.A.P.S. as boxes on a rubric, to think about the "why" and
"how" and "so what" behind the writer's purpose and
audience. This led her to share an article with me (which I still need to read
in its entirety). As I was reading, I noticed that Derrida and his
deconstruction-circle theory were prevalent - suddenly, my mind was racing with
connections! I started to think about Spivak and postcolonial theory, one of my
true passions, and to apply Lacy's thoughts to my background in cultural and
ethnic studies. We both began to rant in tandem! I loved the feeling of
bouncing ideas and random thoughts off of each other. Our energies seemed to
join together, and our tiny Skype pencils were moving constantly, as we tripped
over each other to share our frustrations and views. What an amazing
conversation! One of the things that I love most about SI is being reminded
that writing and thinking sometimes occur best in the presence of other minds.
(Riffing, anyone?!) Thanks, Lacy!
I do love how the bouncing of ideas creates new thought and helps us see new patterns! Like the animated Steven Johnson video we watched! SI is like the ultimate idea incubator!
ReplyDelete